Bandai Spirits reveals a top secret GunPla featuring Perfect Grade Unicorn Gundam Bande Dessinee Version.
The product is still under development, more info will be available on July 15, 2019. Images fromBandai Spirits weibo.
*This is a limited production model kit
I doubt it’s this year’s PGz Notice how it says “limited production”, which implies that this will be either a limited-edition kit or a P-Bandai exclusive.
I mean, they have to mold it in the proper colours, and there's a chance of it including some sort of armament or gimmick that might not be in the regular kit. Either way, if it's anything like the RG version of this thing, it at least has to have a runner for the correct Armed Armor DE colours...
seem like a pg unicorn plus an armed armor DE.
ReplyDeletethat's literally exactly what it is.
Deletei have built that before, using MG 1/100 ver Ka and Armed Armor DE
ReplyDeletehttps://www.instagram.com/p/BV69MWZAZW5/
They milk the PG unicorn so hard
ReplyDeleteIf this ends up being THE Perfect Grade we get for the 40th Anniversary year, that's disappointing. I'm praying for a PG RX-78-2 2.0.
ReplyDeleteI doubt it’s this year’s PGz Notice how it says “limited production”, which implies that this will be either a limited-edition kit or a P-Bandai exclusive.
DeleteIt's literally the same thing. Cool, but still the same.
ReplyDeleteThe thing that puzzles me is why the display is a 3d print/all in grey. All these parts exist and can readily be moulded in colour...
ReplyDelete"Under development" why, there's nothing new in this
ReplyDeleteNew frame pieces? I dunno, it's gotta be *something*
Deletethey literally made 5 version of this dam thing. WHAT DO U MEAN DEVELOPMENT.
DeleteI mean, they have to mold it in the proper colours, and there's a chance of it including some sort of armament or gimmick that might not be in the regular kit. Either way, if it's anything like the RG version of this thing, it at least has to have a runner for the correct Armed Armor DE colours...
DeleteAn pg rx78 2.0 should been better than this
ReplyDelete